Suppose we have a finite set A in **R**. There exists a point x in **R **such that x is not in A. Suppose we take the union of x and A. Call it B. Then A is *still in ***R** and all of the points in A are in B. That is, those points in A were completely unaffected by adding another point to the collection. B is in **R**. Math didn’t break.

So can anyone tell me why NOM still exists and why they believe that the “new” definition of marriage will harm everyone else? Merriam-Webster already made the drastic change. Get over it.

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*

## Leave a Reply